Files
ai_tools_analysis/evaluation_security_aikido_updated.md
T
2026-02-02 13:41:43 +02:00

6.3 KiB

Aikido Security - Enterprise Compatibility Evaluation

Tool Overview

Name: Aikido Security Website: https://aikido.dev Category: AI-Powered Security Platform (Pentesting, Code/Cloud Security) Date Evaluated: 2026-02-02


Privacy & Enterprise Use

Commercial/Enterprise Use Permission

Status: ✅ APPROVED FOR ENTERPRISE USE

Key Findings:

  • Positions as "developer-first" security tool
  • Well-funded startup (recent funding rounds)
  • Enterprise-focused features available
  • Designed for commercial use with SaaS and on-prem options

Model Training on User Data

Status: ✅ LIKELY SAFE (NO PUBLIC INDICATION OF TRAINING)

Key Findings:

  • No public statements indicating customer code used for training
  • GDPR compliant by design (EU regulations require disclosure)
  • Trust Center emphasizes privacy
  • Based on industry standards: AI likely trained on public vulnerability data, NOT private customer code

Data Processing:

  • Scans source code and cloud configurations
  • Uses AI-driven pentesting and simulation
  • Static analysis and AI agent testing
  • Results stored securely per customer account

GDPR Compliance:

  • Any use of customer data for training MUST be disclosed under GDPR
  • Absence of such disclosure suggests no training usage
  • Privacy Officer listed for concerns
  • Data protection by design philosophy

Data Retention Policies

Status: ⚠️ NOT PUBLICLY SPECIFIED

Key Findings:

  • Retention period not publicly disclosed
  • Enterprise customers can likely negotiate terms
  • Scan results and findings stored for dashboard access
  • Likely follows industry standard retention (6-12 months)

Data Sharing Practices

Status: ✅ NO EXTERNAL SHARING (ASSUMED)

Third-Party Sharing:

  • Customer data segregated per account
  • No indication of external sharing
  • GDPR compliance requires strict data handling
  • Privacy Policy states they don't sell data
  • Data shared only with third parties needed to deliver services

Infrastructure:

  • Multi-region hosting available
  • On-premise options for sensitive organizations
  • Private cloud deployments possible

IP & Confidentiality Concerns

Status: ✅ STRONG PROTECTIONS (ASSUMED)

Intellectual Property:

  • You own your code and vulnerability findings
  • Aikido provides scanning and pentest results
  • No IP claims on customer code
  • Reports and findings belong to customer

Confidentiality:

  • GDPR-centric privacy approach
  • SOC 2 compliance likely in progress (newer company)
  • Designed for enterprise pentesting (inherently sensitive)

Pricing & Plans

Pricing Model

Structure: Tiered subscription (public pricing not fully disclosed)

Known Tiers:

  • Free: For students and open-source projects
  • Paid Plans: Per-app or platform subscription
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing with advanced features

Features

Free Tier:

  • Students get Aikido free
  • Open-source project support

Enterprise Features:

  • AI-powered pentesting agents
  • Code and cloud security scanning
  • Continuous monitoring
  • Integration with CI/CD
  • SSO and role-based access

Usage Limits

  • Free tier: Limited scans/apps
  • Paid tiers: Based on number of apps or scan frequency
  • Enterprise: Likely unlimited or high limits

Enterprise Compatibility Assessment

Strengths ✅

  • GDPR compliant by design (privacy-first approach)
  • No indication of training on customer code
  • AI pentesting with developer-friendly UX
  • Privacy Officer available for concerns
  • On-premise deployment options
  • Multi-region hosting
  • Modern, well-funded platform

Concerns ⚠️

  • Newer company - less track record than established players
  • Limited public documentation on data handling specifics
  • SOC 2 compliance status unclear (likely in progress)
  • Retention policies not transparent
  • Requires verification of privacy claims

Recommendations

✅ PROVISIONALLY APPROVED WITH VERIFICATION

Action Required BEFORE Use:

  1. Request written confirmation: No customer code used for training
  2. Verify SOC 2 status: Check current compliance certifications
  3. Clarify data retention: Get specific retention policies in writing
  4. Review DPA: Ensure Data Processing Agreement covers all concerns
  5. Consider on-prem: For highly sensitive codebases

Best For:

  • Organizations wanting modern AI-powered security testing
  • Teams using continuous pentesting
  • Companies comfortable with newer vendors (after verification)
  • Cloud-native applications

Not Ideal For (without verification):

  • Highly regulated industries requiring established vendors
  • Organizations with strict "proven track record" requirements
  • Companies unable to get written privacy guarantees

For Hack Days:

  • ⚠️ Use with caution - requires connecting to code repository
  • Should get written confirmation of privacy policies first
  • Consider using on non-sensitive code first
  • Alternative: Use established tools (Snyk) if time-constrained

Comparison to Alternatives

  • Snyk: More established, explicit "no training" policy, broader adoption
  • Escape AI: Similar AI pentesting, also newer company
  • Traditional SAST/DAST: More established but less AI-native

Sources & References

  1. ChatGPT Evaluation Report - Aikido Security analysis
  2. Aikido Website: https://aikido.dev
  3. Trust Center: Mentioned GDPR compliance
  4. Privacy Policy: States no data selling, GDPR focused

Notes

  • Last Updated: 2026-02-02
  • Evaluator: Claude Code based on ChatGPT findings
  • Key Finding: Aikido appears safe based on GDPR compliance and lack of training disclosures, but requires verification due to limited public documentation
  • Status: Newer player with strong privacy stance, but needs written confirmation before enterprise use

⚠️ VERIFICATION CHECKLIST

Before using Aikido Security, obtain written confirmation of:

  • No customer code used for AI model training
  • Specific data retention periods
  • SOC 2 Type II certification status
  • Data Processing Agreement (DPA) terms
  • On-premise deployment options (if needed)
  • Incident response and breach notification procedures

Recommendation: For hack days, use established tools (Snyk) unless Aikido verification can be completed quickly. For production use, complete full verification process.