Refactor evaluations for Equally AI, Testim, and Virtuoso:

- Removed outdated files and replaced with updated evaluations reflecting current data protection policies and enterprise readiness.
- Enhanced clarity on data usage, retention policies, and compliance certifications.
- Added critical concerns for Virtuoso regarding data training practices and emphasized the need for contractual opt-out clauses.

README.md

@@ -180,22 +180,20 @@ Evaluate usage from Phase 1-2, then choose enterprise tiers based on needs
 
 ## 📄 File Inventory
 
-**Total files created:** 34
-- 21 tool evaluations (original + Claude Code + Google Antigravity)
-- 6 independently verified evaluations (Claude research)
-- 4 master reports (including Hackathon Guide)
-- 2 task/requirement documents
-- 1 README
+**Total files:** 27
+- 21 tool evaluations (one per tool)
+- 4 master reports (README, INDEX, SUMMARY, CROSS_REFERENCE, HACKATHON)
+- 2 task/requirement documents (TASK.md, TASK_Hackathon_tools.md)
 - 1 CLAUDE.md guidance file
 
-**Verified Evaluation Files (February 2026):**
-- `evaluation_design_uxpilot_verified.md`
-- `evaluation_design_lovable_verified.md`
-- `evaluation_design_galileoai_verified.md`
-- `evaluation_testing_diffblue_verified.md`
-- `evaluation_testing_browserstack_verified.md`
-- `evaluation_testing_testim_verified.md`
-- `evaluation_security_aikido_verified.md`
+**Independently Verified Tools (February 2026):**
+- UX Pilot - No training on designs
+- Lovable - Trains by default, opt-out available
+- Galileo AI - Free/Starter outputs PUBLIC
+- Diffblue - 100% on-premises, no external data
+- BrowserStack - Immediate data wipeout
+- Testim - No AI training on customer data
+- Aikido - SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, no code storage
 
 **Storage location:** `C:\source\repos\ai_tools_evaluation\`