initial
This commit is contained in:
commit
6c65691b2e
45 files changed
+8837
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
Task: Evaluate AI Tools for Enterprise Compatibility
|
||||
Your Objectives:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review privacy policies and terms of service for the listed AI tools
|
||||
2. Determine if tools are suitable for enterprise use
|
||||
3. Identify whether any tools use submitted code/data for training their models
|
||||
4. Clarify compliance with existing AI policy (no customer data, restricted codebase exposure)
|
||||
5. Document pricing structure: free tier capabilities, paid plan features, and usage limits
|
||||
|
||||
Tools to Evaluate:
|
||||
Design: Uizard, UX Pilot, Lovable, Galileo AI, Maze AI
|
||||
Development: GitHub Copilot, JetBrains AI, Google Gemini, Continue.dev
|
||||
Testing: Applitools, Testim, Diffblue, Equally AI, BrowserStack, Virtuoso QA
|
||||
Security: Snyk, Aikido, Escape AI Pentesting, Vendavo AI
|
||||
|
||||
# Key Questions to Answer:
|
||||
* Does the privacy policy permit enterprise/commercial use?
|
||||
* Is user code/data used for model training?
|
||||
* What data retention and sharing policies exist?
|
||||
* Are there any IP or confidentiality concerns?
|
||||
* What does the free tier include (limits, features, duration)?
|
||||
* What do paid plans offer and at what cost?
|
||||
* What are usage limits (requests, users, projects, etc.)?
|
||||
|
||||
Deliverable: Summary report identifying which tools meet enterprise requirements and any tools requiring procurement discussion before the hack days.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user